CVE-2000-1237

MEDIUM5.0/ 10.0
Share:
Published: December 31, 2000 at 05:00 AM
Modified: April 3, 2025 at 01:03 AM
Source: cve@mitre.org

Vulnerability Description

The POP3 server in FTGate returns an -ERR code after receiving an invalid USER request, which makes it easier for remote attackers to determine valid usernames and conduct brute force password guessing.

CVSS Metrics

Base Score
5.0
Severity
MEDIUM
Vector String
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Weaknesses (CWE)

NVD-CWE-Other
Source: nvd@nist.gov

AI Security Analysis

01 // Technical Summary

FTGate's POP3 server is vulnerable to a username enumeration attack, allowing remote attackers to identify valid usernames. This information can then be used to launch brute-force password guessing attacks, potentially leading to unauthorized access to email accounts and sensitive data.

02 // Vulnerability Mechanism

Step 1: Connection Establishment: The attacker establishes a TCP connection to the FTGate POP3 server on port 110 (or the configured POP3 port).

Step 2: USER Command Injection: The attacker sends a USER <username> command to the server, where <username> is a potential username to be tested.

Step 3: Error Response Analysis: The attacker analyzes the server's response. If the response is -ERR, the attacker knows that the username is either invalid or the request is malformed. The attacker does not know which.

Step 4: Iteration and Enumeration: The attacker repeats steps 2 and 3, systematically trying different usernames. If the server always returns the same error, the attacker can't distinguish valid usernames from invalid ones.

Step 5: Password Guessing (Brute Force): Once a valid username is identified (or a list of potential usernames is compiled), the attacker can then attempt to brute-force the password using the PASS <password> command. The attacker can then attempt to brute-force the password using the PASS <password> command.

03 // Deep Technical Analysis

The vulnerability stems from the POP3 server's flawed error handling. Specifically, the server returns the same generic -ERR response regardless of whether a provided username in the USER command is valid or invalid. This lack of differentiation allows attackers to systematically probe for valid usernames. The root cause is likely a missing or inadequate check within the USER command processing logic. The server doesn't distinguish between a nonexistent user and a malformed request, leading to the same error response. This design flaw facilitates the enumeration process.

CVE-2000-1237 - MEDIUM Severity (5) | Free CVE Database | 4nuxd