CVE-1999-0207

Source: cve@mitre.org

HIGH
7.5
Published: June 9, 1994 at 04:00 AM
Modified: April 3, 2025 at 01:03 AM

Vulnerability Description

Remote attacker can execute commands through Majordomo using the Reply-To field and a "lists" command.

CVSS Metrics

Base Score
7.5
Severity
HIGH
Vector String
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Weaknesses (CWE)

NVD-CWE-Other
Source: nvd@nist.gov

AI Security Analysis

01 // Technical Summary

Majordomo, a popular mailing list manager, is vulnerable to remote command execution. An attacker can leverage the Reply-To field and the lists command to inject and execute arbitrary commands on the server, potentially leading to complete system compromise.

02 // Vulnerability Mechanism

Step 1: Craft Malicious Email: The attacker crafts an email message. The email's Reply-To header contains a malicious command, typically using shell metacharacters (e.g., ;, |, &) to execute arbitrary commands.

Step 2: Send to Majordomo: The attacker sends the crafted email to the Majordomo server's address (e.g., majordomo@example.com).

Step 3: Trigger 'lists' Command: The attacker may need to trigger the lists command. This can sometimes be achieved by simply sending the email. Other times, the attacker may need to send a separate email to Majordomo with a command like lists in the body.

Step 4: Command Execution: Majordomo processes the email and, due to the vulnerability, executes the commands injected in the Reply-To field. This can lead to the execution of arbitrary commands with the privileges of the Majordomo process (often a user with significant permissions).

03 // Deep Technical Analysis

The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation within Majordomo's processing of the Reply-To header when handling the lists command. Specifically, the software fails to properly sanitize the Reply-To field, allowing an attacker to inject shell commands. When Majordomo processes the lists command, it may use the Reply-To field in a way that allows the injected commands to be executed by the underlying operating system. The root cause is a lack of proper input validation and output encoding, leading to a command injection vulnerability.

04 // Exploitation Status

While this vulnerability is old, it is still theoretically exploitable if vulnerable versions of Majordomo are deployed. There is likely no **Actively exploited** activity due to the age of the vulnerability and the lack of widespread use of Majordomo. However, **Public PoC** code likely exists.

05 // Threat Intelligence

This vulnerability is not directly associated with specific APT groups or malware campaigns in modern times due to its age. However, if a vulnerable system is discovered, any attacker could leverage it. CISA KEV: Not Listed

06 // Detection & Hunting

  • Monitor email logs for suspicious Reply-To headers containing shell metacharacters (e.g., ;, |, &, $(, `).

  • Analyze Majordomo's log files for unusual activity, especially related to the processing of the lists command.

  • Network traffic analysis: Look for unusual network connections originating from the Majordomo server after receiving emails with suspicious Reply-To headers.

  • File integrity monitoring: Monitor critical system files for unauthorized modifications.

07 // Remediation & Hardening

  • Upgrade to a patched version of Majordomo or a more secure mailing list manager. If upgrading is not possible, consider disabling the lists command if not required.

  • Implement robust input validation and output encoding to sanitize all user-supplied data, especially the Reply-To header.

  • Restrict the permissions of the Majordomo process to the minimum necessary.

  • Apply the principle of least privilege to all user accounts on the server.

  • Implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to filter malicious requests.

08 // Affected Products

Majordomo versions prior to patched releases.
Advertisement